g  e  n  u  i  n  e  i  d  e  a  s
  home   art and
science
writings biography   food   inventions search
FED UP
Nov 2022
We should concentrate on SUPPLY over DEMAND

 


        What causes inflation? The usual explanation points to an imbalance between supply and demand, where excess money is chasing a limited supply of goods, and prices rise. But this glib trope is misleading, because income is normally fixed, implying demand will eventually drop in the face of higher prices.  Equilibrium inflation of this type is self-limiting- prices will reach a new (higher) plateau and stay there until supply increases. No external interventions are required to dampen the rate of growth.

           We are not facing equilibrium price inflation. Instead, we are dealing with runaway inflation where there is a kind of "open-loop” behavior at work. In this case, supplies lag demand, prices rise in response AND in tandem the ability to pay increases, allowing demand to grow and prices to spiral out of control.

             Like feedback in an audio amplifier.

           In our current inflationary spiral, supply constraints can be traced back to the societal disruptions of Covid, Ukraine affecting the price of oil, uncertainty over the prospect of an expanded war and the lack of political cohesion.  But in tandem demand is spiraling upward because long over-due wage pressure is finally gaining traction with employers, while deferred consumer discretionary spending remains strong.  

         For this reason, the FED’s continued intervention is irrelevant (like the Big Bang Theory’s famous observation that The Last Crusade's outcome did not depend on Indiana Jones). Perversely, by raising the cost of doing business by raising interest rates, the FED simply tosses fuel on the cost fire, raising prices even higher. In fact, by hiking long-term interest rates, the FED discourages exactly those long-term capital investments which would eventually expand supply. Possibly slowing recovery.

           There is some evidence that inflation is lower in countries which only slowly exited from Covid and the economy did not overheat. Declaring covid as “over” was a red flag in front of a bull.

           Most likely, these factors will burn out on their own.

           However, the urge to do SOMETHING is a political imperative. The FED hopes to knock the economy out of its inflationary price spiral by raising prices faster than wages can adapt by brutally increasing borrowing costs. Lowering the gain on the feedback loop. Diminishing expectations. Damaging the lives of the poor who lacked discretionary income in the first place.           

           But doing nothing to help increase “supply”.

          Pining for the FED to return us to the “good ol’ days” of 2019 means higher unemployment and lower wages and more income disparity. If the government was realistic about inflation rates and stopped using the blunt instrument of the FED to do its dirty work and started to actually help manage the economy, we could recover faster and more robustly. Reliance on the FED is politically expedient and merely shifts bad news away from Capitol Hill. But the FED’s sole tool of adjusting interest rates creates more damage than good and tends to favor businesses over employees. We need to adopt a broad-based action plan to have any hope of a safe landing.

           If that interpretation is correct, then Congress and the President must act. Possible initiatives include:

  • A national $15 minimum wage. Like the FED boosting interest rates to cool the economy, a high minimum wage increases the cost of business, but at least puts money in the hands of people who suffer the most from inflation.
  • A two-tiered FED rate. Lower rates to invest in the future, for example clean energy or affordable housing. Higher rates for luxury goods and low productivity businesses. Rising GDP/person pays for retirement, poweres innovations and prevents society from fighting over the crumbs of a shrinking pie.
  • A temporary excise tax on excess profits. Many companies are raising prices to gouge their customers, while others are making a prudent business decision to build a cushion against further inflation or economic disarray. In either case, high profits are driving inflation, and should be directly tamped down.
  • International trade cooperation to share the pain, distribute goods and services to minimize inflation and protect the general welfare.
  • Expanded R&D and long-term investment credits helps companies invest for the future in the midst of uncertainty.
  • Even with inflation, many consumers spend freely. Partly out of frustration from putting their lives on-hold during covid. We should provide an alternate use for their savings that is not immediately inflationary. Perhaps a strong treasury note program with higher rates and longer horizons would be an attractive alternative.
  • While politically taboo, consumers are rushing out to take long overdue vacations while complaining about rising prices. No politician hoping to be reelected would ever point the finger of blame at a constituent. But in times of crisis (think the Great Depression and WWII) leaders encouraged thrift and self-sacrifice for the greater good. To some extent, the FED raising interest rates is a form of "signaling" so the economy will sync-up expectations and neither over or under expand. Similarly, we are desperate for leaders willing to help guide the public's expectations and behavior. Peer pressure is a form of signaling.

       These initiatives could break the inflationary cycle, perhaps generating additional tax revenue and setting the stage for greater productivity.  More importantly, instead of 1-2% inflation as the nominal FED expectation, we might reset at a 3-4% rate, which would help grease the economy (see link for details on how moderate inflation provides room for innovation). 

           We will only return to “normalcy” when supply finally catches up with demand.


Contact Greg Blonder by email here - Modified Genuine Ideas, LLC.